I picked up a new home CO2 monitor yesterday. Here’s a photo. I went with the Aranet4 (HOME edition) because
it’s small and portable with a multi-year battery life
it displays the current CO2 ppm on an e-ink screen and I am a sucker for e-ink – practical and handsome
it logs data, taking a reading every 5 minutes and keeping a 7 day history, accessible using the app (Bluetooth not wi-fi, and I appreciate the lack of dependency on cloud services).
I bought mine on Amazon for the same price as buying direct.
I want to build an intuition for how varying CO2 levels make me feel.
This second, near my desk, CO2 is 463 ppm (ppm = parts per million).
Atmospheric is approx 420 ppm so it’s higher indoors – and higher still when I’ve been sitting in the same room all day.
CO2 levels are pretty dynamic, I’m told. An occupied, closed room will get to 1,000 ppm. A meeting room without fresh air, 1,500 ppm. You can hit over 2,000 ppm in a contained space like a train.
High CO2 levels are an indicator of poor ventilation, which isn’t great for Covid transmission.
But also not good for cognition.
at 1400 ppm, CO2 concentrations may cut our basic decision-making ability by 25 percent, and complex strategic thinking by around 50 percent
Even before that, you start to get drowsy around 1,000 ppm. How much brain fog is not to do with long Covid but simply because I’m no longer sitting in a large, well-ventilated office? I’d like to know.
(Hey so there’s a chance that CO2 levels rise to the point that we all become too dumb to figure out the climate crisis. Ruh roh /insert Scooby Doo gif.)
You can train your own sense of the current ppm by keeping an eye on the sensor read-out and introspecting your personal energy levels. Here’s what my friend Ben Pawle from Nord Projects told me:
We’ve got one in the studio. Actually been surprisingly helpful. When you start getting brain fog and feeling sluggish then you glance and see the co2 is 800 you know to open more windows. Then you feel great! We’ve actually got weirdly good at describing how we feel in terms of energy levels by co2 level
Which is not the first time I’ve heard that!
I’m looking forward to the day when I can walk into a room and say, huh, feels like 800 in here, and decide to sit somewhere else.
Here’s the referenced paper from the article above.
Karnauskas, K. B., Miller, S. L., & Schapiro, A. C. (2020). Fossil Fuel Combustion Is Driving Indoor CO2 Toward Levels Harmful to Human Cognition. GeoHealth, 4(5).
I want to train my mental model for how CO2 levels change over time.
I have questions like:
What happens to CO2 over 4 hours while I’m at my desk?
Does it make a difference that my desk faces a corner – does CO2 collect there as I breathe? How long does it take to equalise over the room?
With the door open? With a window open just a crack?
How long does it take for CO2 to reset to ambient? 5 minutes? An hour? Is a 30 minute break for lunch enough?
To do this I need graphs.
Now I was initially concerned that the Aranet4 sends its logged data only to its own app. Looking at a 7 day graph in an app is fine, but I’d prefer to do my own presentation and analysis. I would like to
collect data over several months and spot correlations. Do I tend to leave the windows closed when it’s colder, for example (of course I do), and is this a problem?
see if mornings are better than afternoons?
get a good sense of what “normal” CO2 variations are over the day and seasonally, indoors/outdoors/etc, and when I should act (the sensor is portable, so I’ll start carrying it around to different venues once I develop a foundational understanding).
Also:
Alerts! If CO2 hits 800 ppm (for example) I would like to ping my smart plug to turn on the coloured Christmas lights that hang on the shelves behind me. That’s not enough to interrupt me if I’m concentrating, but it gives me peripheral vision that I should increase ventilation and I’ll notice it when my head comes out of flow. I’m aaaaall about that ambient awareness.
Devices should have a standard hardware API – a couple of pins that publish events (like: radio re-tuned, or switch pressed, or doorbell motion sensor activated) and accept commands (like: re-tune to X, or remote activate switch, or record and send video)
(It doesn’t need to be copper pins. Wireless is fine too, so long as it’s open.)
(It’s important that this runs locally, without hitting the cloud, because the privacy concerns of this level of access to my home are considerable.)
Basically: I want to work with my home gadgets and appliances as easily as I can set up rules and filters in Gmail.
AND SO I am tentatively happy that there is a Python library for the Aranet4 sensor (pyaranet4)! Good news.
This means that, in theory, I should be able to connect from my Mac, or the always-on Raspberry Pi sitting on the bookshelves, and pull data from the sensor on a regular schedule. And given that I should be able to do all of the above.
A project!
I was born at 335 ppm. Atmospheric CO2 is 25% higher today.
(See co2levels.org for a giant historic graph.)
Ok so there’s noticeable cognitive impairment on complex decision making when CO2 levels are much higher – but is even this 25% atmospheric uplift dinging my IQ?
Like: lead in fuel, as previously discussed: Leaded fuel reduced the IQ of everyone born before 1990 by ~4.25%.
Which is wild, right? And may explain some elements of boomer politics…
But, being more specific, what lead is dinging isn’t just IQ – I seem to remember that lead affects impulse control? And CO2 affects “complex strategic thinking” so that’s an attentional thing, maybe?
I am suuuuuuper out on a limb here, but: smartphones? What if this century’s rise of short-attention-span casual games, attentional disorders, etc, is not to do with too much screen-time at all, but is a symptom of growing up under increased atmospheric CO2?
And so our recently-slightly-diminished inability to hold a coherent thought for a long span of time is what attention-maximiser apps like infinite-scrollers (Twitter) and ad-engagement-optimisers (Facebook) and swipe-skinner-boxes (TikTok, Tinder) are, deep down, all exploiting?
If you enjoyed this post, please consider sharing it by email or on social media. Here’s the link. Thanks, —Matt.
‘Yes, we’ll see them together some Saturday afternoon then,’ she said. ‘I won’t have any hand in your not going to Cathedral on Sunday morning. I suppose we must be getting back. What time was it when you looked at your watch just now?’ "In China and some other countries it is not considered necessary to give the girls any education; but in Japan it is not so. The girls are educated here, though not so much as the boys; and of late years they have established schools where they receive what we call the higher branches of instruction. Every year new schools for girls are opened; and a great many of the Japanese who formerly would not be seen in public with their wives have adopted the Western idea, and bring their wives into society. The marriage laws have been arranged so as to allow the different classes to marry among[Pg 258] each other, and the government is doing all it can to improve the condition of the women. They were better off before than the women of any other Eastern country; and if things go on as they are now going, they will be still better in a few years. The world moves. "Frank and Fred." She whispered something to herself in horrified dismay; but then she looked at me with her eyes very blue and said "You'll see him about it, won't you? You must help unravel this tangle, Richard; and if you do I'll--I'll dance at your wedding; yours and--somebody's we know!" Her eyes began forewith. Lawrence laughed silently. He seemed to be intensely amused about something. He took a flat brown paper parcel from his pocket. making a notable addition to American literature. I did truly. "Surely," said the minister, "surely." There might have been men who would have remembered that Mrs. Lawton was a tough woman, even for a mining town, and who would in the names of their own wives have refused to let her cross the threshold of their homes. But he saw that she was ill, and he did not so much as hesitate. "I feel awful sorry for you sir," said the Lieutenant, much moved. "And if I had it in my power you should go. But I have got my orders, and I must obey them. I musn't allow anybody not actually be longing to the army to pass on across the river on the train." "Throw a piece o' that fat pine on the fire. Shorty," said the Deacon, "and let's see what I've got." "Further admonitions," continued the Lieutenant, "had the same result, and I was about to call a guard to put him under arrest, when I happened to notice a pair of field-glasses that the prisoner had picked up, and was evidently intending to appropriate to his own use, and not account for them. This was confirmed by his approaching me in a menacing manner, insolently demanding their return, and threatening me in a loud voice if I did not give them up, which I properly refused to do, and ordered a Sergeant who had come up to seize and buck-and-gag him. The Sergeant, against whom I shall appear later, did not obey my orders, but seemed to abet his companion's gross insubordination. The scene finally culminated, in the presence of a number of enlisted men, in the prisoner's wrenching the field-glasses away from me by main force, and would have struck me had not the Sergeant prevented this. It was such an act as in any other army in the world would have subjected the offender to instant execution. It was only possible in—" "Don't soft-soap me," the old woman snapped. "I'm too old for it and I'm too tough for it. I want to look at some facts, and I want you to look at them, too." She paused, and nobody said a word. "I want to start with a simple statement. We're in trouble." RE: Fruyling's World "MACDONALD'S GATE" "Read me some of it." "Well, I want something better than that." HoME大香蕉第一时间
ENTER NUMBET 0016www.feillo.com.cn liwibw.com.cn www.hpup.com.cn hxiaol.com.cn www.szlyw008.com.cn www.rostock.net.cn viplyj.com.cn www.uohhfg.com.cn www.qhtq.com.cn www.wwrrgo.com.cn
I picked up a new home CO2 monitor yesterday. Here’s a photo. I went with the Aranet4 (HOME edition) because
I bought mine on Amazon for the same price as buying direct.
I want to build an intuition for how varying CO2 levels make me feel.
This second, near my desk, CO2 is 463 ppm (ppm = parts per million).
Atmospheric is approx 420 ppm so it’s higher indoors – and higher still when I’ve been sitting in the same room all day.
CO2 levels are pretty dynamic, I’m told. An occupied, closed room will get to 1,000 ppm. A meeting room without fresh air, 1,500 ppm. You can hit over 2,000 ppm in a contained space like a train.
High CO2 levels are an indicator of poor ventilation, which isn’t great for Covid transmission.
But also not good for cognition.
Even before that, you start to get drowsy around 1,000 ppm. How much brain fog is not to do with long Covid but simply because I’m no longer sitting in a large, well-ventilated office? I’d like to know.
(Hey so there’s a chance that CO2 levels rise to the point that we all become too dumb to figure out the climate crisis. Ruh roh /insert Scooby Doo gif.)
You can train your own sense of the current ppm by keeping an eye on the sensor read-out and introspecting your personal energy levels. Here’s what my friend Ben Pawle from Nord Projects told me:
Which is not the first time I’ve heard that!
I’m looking forward to the day when I can walk into a room and say, huh, feels like 800 in here, and decide to sit somewhere else.
Here’s the referenced paper from the article above.
Karnauskas, K. B., Miller, S. L., & Schapiro, A. C. (2020). Fossil Fuel Combustion Is Driving Indoor CO2 Toward Levels Harmful to Human Cognition. GeoHealth, 4(5).
I want to train my mental model for how CO2 levels change over time.
I have questions like:
To do this I need graphs.
Now I was initially concerned that the Aranet4 sends its logged data only to its own app. Looking at a 7 day graph in an app is fine, but I’d prefer to do my own presentation and analysis. I would like to
Also:
Alerts! If CO2 hits 800 ppm (for example) I would like to ping my smart plug to turn on the coloured Christmas lights that hang on the shelves behind me. That’s not enough to interrupt me if I’m concentrating, but it gives me peripheral vision that I should increase ventilation and I’ll notice it when my head comes out of flow. I’m aaaaall about that ambient awareness.
So I don’t want my data trapped in an app. I want the sensor to have an hardware API. I wrote about the idea of hardware APIs here (2021):
(It doesn’t need to be copper pins. Wireless is fine too, so long as it’s open.)
(It’s important that this runs locally, without hitting the cloud, because the privacy concerns of this level of access to my home are considerable.)
Basically: I want to work with my home gadgets and appliances as easily as I can set up rules and filters in Gmail.
AND SO I am tentatively happy that there is a Python library for the Aranet4 sensor (pyaranet4)! Good news.
This means that, in theory, I should be able to connect from my Mac, or the always-on Raspberry Pi sitting on the bookshelves, and pull data from the sensor on a regular schedule. And given that I should be able to do all of the above.
A project!
I was born at 335 ppm. Atmospheric CO2 is 25% higher today.
(See co2levels.org for a giant historic graph.)
Ok so there’s noticeable cognitive impairment on complex decision making when CO2 levels are much higher – but is even this 25% atmospheric uplift dinging my IQ?
Like: lead in fuel, as previously discussed:
Which is wild, right? And may explain some elements of boomer politics…
But, being more specific, what lead is dinging isn’t just IQ – I seem to remember that lead affects impulse control? And CO2 affects “complex strategic thinking” so that’s an attentional thing, maybe?
I am suuuuuuper out on a limb here, but: smartphones? What if this century’s rise of short-attention-span casual games, attentional disorders, etc, is not to do with too much screen-time at all, but is a symptom of growing up under increased atmospheric CO2?
And so our recently-slightly-diminished inability to hold a coherent thought for a long span of time is what attention-maximiser apps like infinite-scrollers (Twitter) and ad-engagement-optimisers (Facebook) and swipe-skinner-boxes (TikTok, Tinder) are, deep down, all exploiting?